By clicking the button below you are agreeing to the terms of service.
<placeholder>
<placeholder>
<placeholder>
<placeholder>.
<placeholder>
Hrvatski
Dansk
Nederlands
English
Eesti
Français
Deutsche
ελληνικά
Magyar
Italiano
Norsk
Português
Español
Svenska
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tournaments Header
What tournaments do you want?
I have created quite a few recent tournaments, what do you like about them, what do you hate about them?
TO: JCUK
Players: 24
Buy In: 10 points
Total Awarded: 240 points
Award % Breakdown: 100
Feb 1 2020, 11:03
Tournament created by JCUK
Round 1
2 Games
Barbarossa Map Image
12 : Standard : Crusade : Sequential : Escalite : One : Anywhere : Chance : 24 hr (casual) : Public
Round 2
2 Games
Barbarossa Map Image
12 : Standard : Sixers : Sequential : Escalite : One : Anywhere : Chance : 24 hr (casual) : Public
Round 3
1 Games
Barbarossa Map Image
12 : Standard : Singles : Sequential : Escalite : One : Anywhere : Chance : 24 hr (casual) : Public

Comments

EasyToKill Image

EasyToKill

Mon Feb 10 17:54:48 2020

A little (Red) birdie told me...
Sebrim Image

Sebrim

Sat Feb 8 06:08:13 2020

How do you know that, actually, EasyKill? Even I wasn't yet around when that happened :-)
Cardinalsrule Image

Cardinalsrule

Fri Feb 7 16:55:22 2020

It's a FANTASTIC setting, JCUK. But, as Easy said, 2 players kept making a bunch of 6-8 player doubles game and winning them all, so Bado decided to end their fun.
JCUK Image

JCUK

Fri Feb 7 03:16:13 2020

@EasyToKill that's interesting, it seems quite a good setting. Maybe it works better in a tournament when teams are random.
EasyToKill Image

EasyToKill

Thu Feb 6 16:47:45 2020

Brian, the Team assassin setting isn't available in the standard game section. So, it's completely non-existent, has been for quite a few years, when Badorties decided it was 'predatory' after two players not to be named won about 100 doubles assassin games.
JCUK Image

JCUK

Tue Feb 4 14:33:08 2020

I definitely agree that the the quad team assassin is an interesting setting and seems to be working well so far. It takes a lot of team work and can be swings and roundabouts when different strategies are employed. It seems to work well in a tourney where one team is not full of highly experienced players and walks over the other team.
brianstheman Image

brianstheman

Mon Feb 3 22:39:10 2020

The other cool setting is Team Assassin. This is basically non-existent in the standard game section. Therefore many have not developed a sense of strategy for it. While this may cause some frustration, say in a 3 team game where two teams attack one, instead of 1v1v1, ultimately it's pretty interesting.
JCUK Image

JCUK

Mon Feb 3 17:05:30 2020

@Loki, that would require 48 players. I don't start 48 player tournaments, these days they can take a few months to fill by the looks of some the most recent 48 players tournaments, by that time people have left the site which ruins a whole tourney if people are awol. @Clarkenfeld, I don't think I will be joining many/if any team game tournaments from now on. I am in too many where 'the same people' don't communicate at all and make it so difficult. @Brain, I will continue to make the tournaments you highlighted in your comment as they seem popular.
Lokiskittens Image

Lokiskittens

Mon Feb 3 15:33:13 2020

and then round 2 is still 24 players (2 games of 12)
Lokiskittens Image

Lokiskittens

Mon Feb 3 15:32:38 2020

Can you do a 12 player crusade or will this create problems?
brianstheman Image

brianstheman

Mon Feb 3 13:34:02 2020

I like that we are seeing larger team games which otherwise haven't filled recently through conventional means. The Crusades are great (as featured here). A 24p Sixers in another. The volume is great also. Before seemed like had to join every tourney, as they seemed scarce. Now, with more options, can pick a few, which leaves open space for others. Would think this should enhance overall participation.
clarkenfeld Image

clarkenfeld

Mon Feb 3 09:53:03 2020

I like tournaments. That's what I like. I hate losing them. Especially through personal incompetence. I'm also not a big fan of non-communicative team mates.
Are you searching for a place to play RISK online? Try a Risk-Like game here at Major Command. We offer a unique global conquest game that will satisfy your RISK online cravings. RISK is a trademark of Hasbro. Major Command is not associated with Hasbro or thier RISK game in any way. | Privacy | Terms | Flash10+ required.
Major Command Game is always working on Upgrades and Improvements - Please suport us if you can. Thank You! :-)
Membership Options
It is your turn in 0 games
Jump To Games